Over 102781
motifake

Traitor Demotivational Poster


12 Angry Men -




LOYALTY -




HANG HANOI JANE FONDA -


TAGS: political treason traitor jane fonda
Rating: 3.44/5

More motifakes by Mark

Fredric T - July 28, 2009, 10:01 am
But she gets away in that one Kind of a downer realy
Mark - March 21, 2009, 9:23 pm
If more people had voted for McCain we could be watching a public execution on pay-per-view tonight.
WTFO - February 27, 2009, 7:38 pm
I saw one of those when I deployed last year. I always chose that urinal, then some PC prick had it removed. I almost pity the sucker that had to peel it out of the urinal.
Mark - February 16, 2009, 11:46 pm
Deltabob - From what I've seen that's pretty much standard issue at every VFW, American Legion, and AMVETS, that I've ever been in.


WAIT JUST A MINUTE - i want one more picture before i go




BENEDICT ARNOLD - Because some people will do anything, even switch political parties and betray their constituents just to be in the majority


TAGS: team switching double crossing traitor
Rating: 2.7/5

More motifakes by LogicDude

Sean - April 29, 2009, 12:16 am
dammit, what's it going to take for me to irritate you? take it easy man. bye.
BoneCD - April 28, 2009, 11:47 pm
...before and thinking you're going to change everything by taking her on. Dude it will not happen.
BoneCD - April 28, 2009, 11:45 pm
Seany you don't irritate me...and you never have. It is just fun to have an exchange of ideas. I myself feel that he has betrayed those that voted for him. And no matter what side you're on that is sad. It is like marring a chick that's been married 7...
Sean - April 28, 2009, 11:41 pm
Much like the editorial policy of Cat Fancy Magazine, your country is still democratic, no? And you value people seeking and maintaining employment, no? And I irritate you by saying "no?" no?
BoneCD - April 28, 2009, 11:35 pm
He doesn't want to be in the majority...He wants to get reelected and can't as a Republican. That to me is pure power hunger!!! He should be took out back and shot like the ass that he now is.
Sean - April 28, 2009, 10:42 pm
And you just might find my "consulting fees" exorbitantly reasonable.
LogicDude - April 28, 2009, 10:41 pm
Benedict Arrrrrlen??? Damn! I should have consulted with Sean, Noted Oracle of Motifake before posting...
Sean - April 28, 2009, 10:40 pm
THAT'S the spirit. You're better off without him. Oh wait. You're not.
WTFO - April 28, 2009, 10:35 pm
He was already voting with the Dems. He might as well drink the Kool-aid and put the donkey on his chest.
Sean - April 28, 2009, 10:08 pm
*cough cough* BENEDICT ARLEN *cough*
Sean - April 28, 2009, 6:30 pm
Hey, what can I say? I gotta be loved ... Oh, you probably meant Abe Vigoda here .... Nevermind.


FLAGS OF OUR FATHERS -




The Firing Line -




2 PEOPLE JUST WALKING SOMEWHERE... -




THE BIGGER PICTURE - Conspiracy theororists unite! Those at the top were the terrorists.


TAGS: pnac 9 11 conspiracy traitors terrorists
Rating: 1.89/5

More motifakes by bOB cHIN

TheTrashHeap - August 24, 2009, 11:00 am
PKP to clarify if the situation directly involves you talking about it is discussion not Gossip. This site is a perfect venue for sex jokes. Give it up you have no argument.
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 8:46 am
That's nice.
culos - August 24, 2009, 8:45 am
Don't give a flying fuck. If you publish your name at random on the Internet you open yourself up to things like this. Ever heard about Google????
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 8:41 am
Why would you post a link to my MySpace here? Did you ask if I wanted it posted here first or don't you care?
culos - August 24, 2009, 8:15 am
I agree, let's have a little compassion. Let's kill him gently...
Arrogant Knight - August 24, 2009, 8:14 am
That's...actually kinda sad.
Arrogant Knight - August 24, 2009, 8:08 am
Wow. You have got to be kidding...
culos - August 24, 2009, 8:06 am
Thanks for the advice. I now also know why:http://www.myspace.com/kondorskave That really explains it all.....
Arrogant Knight - August 24, 2009, 8:01 am
Don't even try to reason with him culos. You won't get anywhere.
culos - August 24, 2009, 8:00 am
PKP do you realize we have a forum section where you can dump your opinions? This is the comment section, hardly the place for epic rants....
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:52 am
opinion such as that makes me "juvenile" or "14 years old" in some people's eyes; then I'll be "juvenile" in that respect all the way through. I've said my peace.
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:52 am
stand by every word I said about bOB and other 9/11 conspiracy theorists. They mock, ridicule, and trash this great nation and make light of hero's deaths; as well as call the government murderers. And if me getting upset about it when someone voices an
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:52 am
virtually all their Motifake time joking, gossiping, and "engaging" with other members in the way he does has absolutely 0 argument when he turns around and labels a political minded person who gets upset when his nation is ridiculed "juvenile". And I
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:52 am
place. I have no intentions to hold a grudge. If we could sweep all this shit under the rug and have a proverbial internet beer together that' be great. If that never happens believe me I won't cry about it. But my point remains that anyone who spends
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:51 am
I don't "feel left out" of any gossiping chatroom clique; I just simply never cared to go there. Maybe I will someday. And also for the record; believe it or not I DON'T want you banned; as to be honest you are one of the people who brings life to this
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:51 am
Motifake time attacking and flaming other members (or ... "engaging" as he puts it), gossiping, and trolling has no basis of a claim to call another Motifaker "juvenile". And I'm glad that other members are realizing what is going on. And no,
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:51 am
instead of admitting he was caught; therefore displaying the "juvenile" behavior that he accuses others of having. For the record I don't give a rat's hairy ass who makes sex jokes nor who gossips; but my point was that a person who spends all their
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 24, 2009, 7:50 am
Well stated WTFO. Also, let the record show that I gave Trash Heap ample and accurate examples, including DIRECT QUOTES from him, of his sex jokes and gossiping (after he requested I do so three times); and Trash Heap proceeded to deny and make excuses
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 6:34 pm
Blah, blah, blah. Rant rant rant. Back to the clique. At times you're respectful other times you're just another TTH. If you don't want to be dragged in, then back off others' right to post comments about topics you don't like.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 23, 2009, 6:21 pm
That's all I have to say, don't try to drag me into your bullshit again.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 23, 2009, 6:20 pm
I have done my best to stay out of this but you keep mentioning me and putting words in my mouth. The porcelina thing has nothing to do with you. You're just using it to curry favor with her friends.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 23, 2009, 6:14 pm
I really don't fucking care what you think anyways. Porcelina attacked me and TTH wayyyyy before any of this happened. Trying to throw her weight around. BTW, are you trying to imply that you have never argued with her?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 23, 2009, 6:12 pm
1.P said in that very comment thread that she wasn't Goth. 2.None of my comments were directed at her, When I said "you" I was talking about goth kids in general. She may have mistakenly thought I meant her, but I let her know later that I didn't.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 6:08 pm
there are many folks who like the chat room poster, only a few pricks lash out at other motifakers based on their political discussions. Haar, Aggy, MO and others show respect. The 3 I listed attack and bully others. No backpedaling involved.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 6:07 pm
Again you prove what a stupid fuck you are. I never defended PKP's attacks or anybody else's. I point out how you are a hypocrite for pointing the finger at others for doing the same thing you do. You are also apparently too ignorant to realize that while
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 6:06 pm
You are obviously trying to continue a flame war that should have died yesterday. I will not stoop to your level. This is over and if you choose to continue you will only be talking to yourself.
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:54 pm
You are just grasping at straws now, hoping someone will agree with you. You originally called the fans of pats place a clique but now you are too scared of losing favor to list those supposed members. You sure can backpedal when it suits you.
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:50 pm
So PKP going after bob for making this poster was pro free speech i suppose? as was your last comment on the obama poster preceding this? You are the hypocrite and the bane of free speech, as are your politiclique.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 5:47 pm
position is that you don't, I'm sure it wouldn't take much research to find your words to again prove more of your hypocrisy.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 5:47 pm
In recent attacks on politifakers, the anti free speech has included you, Moo+ and AK. As for your claim of me using "childish insults" instead of debate. I agree at times I treat punks on this site with the same tactics they use on others. If your
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:43 pm
List the members of the clique please.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 5:41 pm
Aww. Did I hurt your little feelings? I provide proof and logic and often your own words to show how you and your clique bully others on the site. You are either completely delusional about your own tactics or simply a complete hypocritical liar.
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:38 pm
Never what they should discuss, sometimes the way they are discussing it though. I have never run to MR M. Have you? I see no further point in trying to debate with someone who resorts to childish insults when he can't defend himself with logic.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 5:35 pm
Again you twist truth to your own purposes. You constantly tell others what they shouldn't discuss not just this poster. Your entry into this poster and your continued BS prove your a childish moron. 'he started it' 'Mr. M said no rants, I'm telling'
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:34 pm
BTW look up the definition of rant. If I have 40% of the comments while replying to 2 polititimmies i am under average in comments. 1 of me 2 of you! get it? You really do have a narrow view of the world.
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:31 pm
first stone, all I did was defend bob's right to his opinion same as the porcelina thread. Your own examples have proven you wrong.
TheTrashHeap - August 23, 2009, 5:30 pm
You mean because my original post on this thread was in defense of The poster creator's Harmless opinion against PKP then you must be confused. That is not hypocrisy, it's defense of free speech. He stated an opinion and PKP attacked him. PKP threw the
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 4:48 pm
this thread proves beyond a doubt that you are a complete hypocrite.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 4:48 pm
To be fair, in that same comment thread, TTH did respectfully engage and made a great point about avoiding cliques (chat room ones included) and even stated "We all have the right to our harmless opinions no matter what they are based on", which added to
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 4:41 pm
biggest losers" and "You're not a vampire or a satanist. You're a fucking loser in black clothes and makeup. creating a persona to cover how big a douche you are is worse than just being a douche" Some "engagement" take you BS elsewhere, I don't buy it.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 4:40 pm
Moo+, you claim you engage and not attack? Here's how you entered the EMO poster "Are you trying to say Goth isn't for pussies? Cuz it is" when asked by P (who is goth) you continue The goth clique is always made up of the kids who would have been the
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 4:37 pm
As for your claim that you're not ranting. A quick count shows you've commented just on this poster 68 times. That's 40% of the entire comments. Numbers don't lie, you're ranting regardless what you tell yourself.
WTFO - August 23, 2009, 4:33 pm
TTH, yes I copied and pasted. I also denoted that those weren't my words by adding the "" around the statements. That is called citing experts to support positions and facts. Maybe if you weren't such a pothead, you'd remember more from school.
Haarakkon - August 22, 2009, 5:48 pm
Hey, Saskatchewan doesn't work as well.
Haarakkon - August 22, 2009, 5:47 pm
OMG (Ontario/Manitoba Gangsters) - cornering the comment market on Motifake. (Level-headed? Mature? Somebody notarize this so I can show the wife!)
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 5:41 pm
By definition you are correct sir. Attack was a poor choice of words. Engage may have been more apt.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 22, 2009, 5:09 pm
I disagree, NO ONE attacked P. We simply disagreed with her and she couldn't take the criticism. If anyone was "attacking" it was her.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:18 pm
A 3 comment reply to multiple questions is not a rant. You (wtfo) have filled pages with copy paste (Did you think we wouldn't notice?) about political issues. PKP quoted me earlier referring to a certain tactic, created by mooooooo. Think about it.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:12 pm
Read closer. Porcelina left after MANY people attacked her. If she chose to lay blame on an individual in order to maximize effect then I suppose that's the prerogative of a teenage girl. Sean and Haar always levelheaded can see what should be obvious.
Haarakkon - August 22, 2009, 1:52 pm
TTH is smart enough to realize the irony in using Paul and WTFO tactics in the comment section, and that irony is in itself of the highest amusement factor (for me, anyway).
Haarakkon - August 22, 2009, 1:50 pm
Sean made some excellent observations, and all were dead on. WTFO, how many times have you denigrated a comment instantly to "FOMF" when someone disagrees? Granted, you've been a lot better lately about it.
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:33 pm
turned you into exactly what you claim to hate. BTW, don't mistake mutual respect between PKP, Mark, Me and others as "hero" worship. Here on motifake, you are annoying and insignificant (probably just like real life for you.)
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:31 pm
of a motifaker on this site. Very few posters with negligible "funny" involved. Tons of comments (mostly attacking and insulting others), and a general overall self-entitlement attitude that disgusts me. Funny how your crusade against long rants has
rerun - August 22, 2009, 1:31 pm

Granted P has some issues, but I think TTH holds a large postion of the blame on her leaving. I guess I just don't have patience for bullies. This is supposed to be a fun place to hang out & needle each other in a good way. TTH is taking things to far.
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:29 pm
education level. PKP did an outstanding job of answering your questions TTH and poointing out your lies and hypocrisy to others on the site and you can't handle it. You make BS excuses or redirect the discussion. You clearly are the most pathetic example
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:27 pm
rerun, overall you have a great assessment of TTH. However, unlike him I'm not a fan of running other people off this site. He's just a prick trying to bully others because he is too ignorant or apathetic to understand conversations held at a higher
Sean - August 22, 2009, 1:24 pm
No one ran P. anywhere. She just happened to be the world's most sensitive Satanist. Sensitivity and Satanism -- hardly a stable combination. And TTH hasn't crossed any lines that I have seen.
rerun - August 22, 2009, 1:19 pm

I am beginning to think TTH shoulkd be banned. He ran Porci off, and seems to be making a good argument for being an ass in general.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:02 pm
Pat's place was turned into a chat room by a large group of contributors, nobody was excluded so long as they didn't prattle on and on about politics. If you Politifakers felt left out it was your own attitude that put you on the outside.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 12:59 pm
are grasping for any little shred of evidence to back up your beliefs. Your examples are so thin and could be applied to almost any contributor on this site. I had to ask the question 3 times because you could not answer for your asinine assertions.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 12:57 pm
I was involved in the situation with the unnamed motifaketress in question therefore not gossip. Making the occasional lewd comment toward a broken record politifaker or a pedo pusher like zed is perfectly acceptable. Just like your hero wtfo you really
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:46 am
then proceed to call people who engage in political discussion childish and "juvenile". Like I said it's truly a pot calling a kettle black if there ever was one.
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:43 am
subject of your comments. And I could easily find more. So there's your requested examples. Now go ahead and say I'm "whining" after I answered a question that you asked three times. I don't care if people gossip, but don't partake in all that shit and
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:41 am
timmy tactic to show her she was susceptible to the same treatment." followed immediately by, "now she wants to have my comments blocked because she can't take half of what she dishes out. That's crybaby shit." I won't say the Motifaker who was the
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:41 am
need not look any further than your comments in the infamous "Everyone is staring at us" poster comments section. That place is basically a chatroom. There you said, "her comments were completely unprovoked and I wondered if I could adapt mooooo's reverse
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:41 am
after you asked for examples, not complaining about it. There are more similar in the comments section to that poster; such as suggesting if my parents are cousins. Once again just answering your question. And as for an example of you gossiping, I
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:40 am
but you did say, If you want pedo posters, there must be a millions of other sites you could visit. And if you are Zed,,, you're a pedophile." as well as, "Those salty blindfolded lollipops you loved so much as a kid". I'm simply answering your question,
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 4:40 am
If you don't want to read my writing than don't ask. You did ask. Now; as for an example of your sex jokes, Mr. Trash Heap, may I remind you of your comments on my "biased unfair treatment" poster? Granted it was mostly Moooooooooooooooooooo who did it;
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 3:00 am
Yeah um... After seeing your "style" here, I don't think I'm gonna bother reading your blog.
Haarakkon - August 22, 2009, 2:56 am
Pass. I'm kinda forced to read this one.
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 2:53 am
I am who I am. And I believe the tale of you being an astronaut; as your comments are always out in space. And at the risk of sounding like I'm seeking attention, while your at my MySpace; take a read to some of my blogs if you want a writing sample.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:48 am
Now I am the king of England. Yup that's what I want to call myself, so that's what I am!
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:46 am
Balls? So those of us smart enough to provide ourselves with some anonymity have no balls? You better re-think that one.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:44 am
I am a sawyer. Also an astronaut, just never been in a shuttle or up into space. But since I believe it, I AM an astronaut.
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 2:42 am
No as of the moment I have not yet been published; but give me time. What line of work are you in, BTW?
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 2:41 am
You mean the balls enough to use my real name. And my name does not make me an attention grabber, sorry. And the one who made mention of my MySpace was you. If I wanted to bring attention I'd have posted links to it all over the forum.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:39 am
So how many books? Or those examples you promised earlier? Having a hard time living up to your own bs huh?
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:38 am
Found? The attention grab was using your own name and having a wide open myspace acct. not like a lot of hits come up when you type that name in.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:35 am
You used your real name! How much obsession does it take to copy/paste and google? I mostly wanted to see if you were dumb enough to use your real name or if it was some obscure reference. Both kinda. Guessing so far unpublished eh?
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 2:33 am
And you were the one who found my MySpace and started perusing it. Are you a stalker?
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 2:32 am
Um... what attention grab would that be? You were the one obsessed with finding out information about me.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:30 am
Nice attention grab Paul. How many books have you published? Or articles? Or jokes in readers digest? You are an author right? btw examples?
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:28 am
also I draw many laughs from your stereotypical behavior, so debating with you is funny. Just listening to you isn't
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 2:27 am
Good research, Trash Heap!! I was wondering when someone would find my MySpace page.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 2:26 am
That as by far the most intelligent thing you have said on this site. First time you weren't just taking up space. Glad you finally came around. You may have noticed that I can mix humor with a serious debate. You are capable of neither.
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:46 am
BTW, why are you arguing?? This is a place for funny. Shut up and go some other site to debate 9-11 conspiracy. BRING BACK THE FUNNY!!! I come here to relax! God, you ranters suck! You're so annoying! Shut up already! *snickers*
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:43 am
That's all you hear because you just puke forth the same conspiracy BS you take in. At least I get my info from reputable sources. Also, you make a great analogy. This adult is speaking (writing) and you as a child only hear wah wah. Perfect assessment.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:42 am
Waste of time arguing with sheep. wah wah baaaaaaaaa!
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:41 am
yup. word for word. you copypaster! No big surprise.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:40 am
If you plan to repeat verbatim something you raed on a website supporting YOUR beliefs, save your breath. I have seen you do it a thousand times and it all sounds like when the adults talk on charlie brown cartoons. wah wah wah? wah wah? wah!
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:40 am
levels" "4 numerous fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack them". See if you can handle facts provided by experts versus liberal bloggers.
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:38 am
high-rise structures subjected to damage from impact and from fire will collapse" "2 The collapse of WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7" "3 WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:38 am
Good luck with that Paul. And remember adding a joke to a "your mama" thread is not telling sex jokes, Its being part of the community.
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:36 am
why it has never happened like that before...because those specific conditions have never existed before. See how that works? No? "1. Although prior to that day high-rise structures had never collapsed, The collapse of WTC 1 & 2 showed that certain
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:36 am
On third thought Sean I'm gonna guess he is 34, single, and crazy enough to use his real name as a Nic. I would also guess that he has a myspace page. What did I win?
Paul Kondor Poduszlo - August 22, 2009, 1:34 am
I'm taking a break, eating chips, and watching Greta van Sustren on Fox News at the moment. I deal with the important things first, you know. But I'll get back to you soon.
WTFO - August 22, 2009, 1:34 am
The 20 story hole was reported by a fireman. You keep insisting that it couldn't have happened because it's never happened like that before. This is the mantra of the conspiracy bloggers and uninformed follers of theirs. I'll let you in on a secret as to
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:28 am
Yeah. That's what I thought.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:27 am
Still waiting paul.
TheTrashHeap - August 22, 2009, 1:26 am
reference to a 20 story hole is proof of nothing. Its not a "fact". The way the building collapsed in on itself is suspicious and has never been explained to my satisfaction. On the video I saw no evidence of a 20 story hole.


PREV PAGE